BTG Advisory

Following the Supreme Court ruling in 2015 in the case of Vince v Wyatt, the way became open for any divorcee that had not completed a financial order to bring an action against their former spouse, regardless of how long ago they divorced.

An entrepreneur suffered a serious knee injury, preventing him from work or foreign travel. His past earnings record was erratic, and he was involved in numerous very diverse and multi-national projects, ranging from telecoms to sailing to product and property development. His financial affairs were complex, and his accounting records wholly inadequate for estimating his earnings but for the accident.

A young self-employed carpenter was killed in a fatal accident, resulting in a claim for loss of dependency that was put at just under £2million for earnings and pension.

A living mesothelioma claimant was employed in a senior management role with complex high earnings and bonus scheme. The forensic accountant acting for him had estimated loss of earnings and pension benefits at £3million.

Husband was engaged in property investment and development, conducted through dozens of separate business entities, some holding investment properties and others for building projects. The corporate structure was complex, with different ownership structures in various entities. Husband had grouped the companies into four business segments totalling £2.2million.

In a Serious Fraud Office prosecution, several directors of a group of companies engaged in the selling and administration of buy-to-let properties were charged with conspiracy to defraud.

A man operating two commercial whelk fishing boats brought a claim against a local authority, alleging financial losses arising from their actions in removing pots and other fishing equipment from the yard he used.

Two companies – one a furniture manufacturer, the other a mixed farm – were part of a deceased’s estate that was valued for probate purposes. Three years later, the beneficiaries were still in dispute, and the matter was heading to Mediation.

Two accountants entered into partnership, operated an accountancy practice with one office. Over time, they acquired more practices and offices and incorporated the business into a limited company structure. Eventually the partners fell out and agreed to divide equally the business and net assets, including good will. However, they took different approaches to the valuation – one as a multiple fee basis, the other as a multiple of profits.

Following the Supreme Court ruling in 2015 in the case of Vince v Wyatt, the way became open for any divorcee that had not completed a financial order to bring an action against their former spouse, regardless of how long ago they divorced.

An entrepreneur suffered a serious knee injury, preventing him from work or foreign travel. His past earnings record was erratic, and he was involved in numerous very diverse and multi-national projects, ranging from telecoms to sailing to product and property development. His financial affairs were complex, and his accounting records wholly inadequate for estimating his earnings but for the accident.

A young self-employed carpenter was killed in a fatal accident, resulting in a claim for loss of dependency that was put at just under £2million for earnings and pension.

A living mesothelioma claimant was employed in a senior management role with complex high earnings and bonus scheme. The forensic accountant acting for him had estimated loss of earnings and pension benefits at £3million.

Husband was engaged in property investment and development, conducted through dozens of separate business entities, some holding investment properties and others for building projects. The corporate structure was complex, with different ownership structures in various entities. Husband had grouped the companies into four business segments totalling £2.2million.

In a Serious Fraud Office prosecution, several directors of a group of companies engaged in the selling and administration of buy-to-let properties were charged with conspiracy to defraud.

A man operating two commercial whelk fishing boats brought a claim against a local authority, alleging financial losses arising from their actions in removing pots and other fishing equipment from the yard he used.

Two companies – one a furniture manufacturer, the other a mixed farm – were part of a deceased’s estate that was valued for probate purposes. Three years later, the beneficiaries were still in dispute, and the matter was heading to Mediation.

Two accountants entered into partnership, operated an accountancy practice with one office. Over time, they acquired more practices and offices and incorporated the business into a limited company structure. Eventually the partners fell out and agreed to divide equally the business and net assets, including good will. However, they took different approaches to the valuation – one as a multiple fee basis, the other as a multiple of profits.

Following the Supreme Court ruling in 2015 in the case of Vince v Wyatt, the way became open for any divorcee that had not completed a financial order to bring an action against their former spouse, regardless of how long ago they divorced.

An entrepreneur suffered a serious knee injury, preventing him from work or foreign travel. His past earnings record was erratic, and he was involved in numerous very diverse and multi-national projects, ranging from telecoms to sailing to product and property development. His financial affairs were complex, and his accounting records wholly inadequate for estimating his earnings but for the accident.

A young self-employed carpenter was killed in a fatal accident, resulting in a claim for loss of dependency that was put at just under £2million for earnings and pension.

A living mesothelioma claimant was employed in a senior management role with complex high earnings and bonus scheme. The forensic accountant acting for him had estimated loss of earnings and pension benefits at £3million.

Husband was engaged in property investment and development, conducted through dozens of separate business entities, some holding investment properties and others for building projects. The corporate structure was complex, with different ownership structures in various entities. Husband had grouped the companies into four business segments totalling £2.2million.

In a Serious Fraud Office prosecution, several directors of a group of companies engaged in the selling and administration of buy-to-let properties were charged with conspiracy to defraud.

A man operating two commercial whelk fishing boats brought a claim against a local authority, alleging financial losses arising from their actions in removing pots and other fishing equipment from the yard he used.

Two companies – one a furniture manufacturer, the other a mixed farm – were part of a deceased’s estate that was valued for probate purposes. Three years later, the beneficiaries were still in dispute, and the matter was heading to Mediation.

Two accountants entered into partnership, operated an accountancy practice with one office. Over time, they acquired more practices and offices and incorporated the business into a limited company structure. Eventually the partners fell out and agreed to divide equally the business and net assets, including good will. However, they took different approaches to the valuation – one as a multiple fee basis, the other as a multiple of profits.

Following the Supreme Court ruling in 2015 in the case of Vince v Wyatt, the way became open for any divorcee that had not completed a financial order to bring an action against their former spouse, regardless of how long ago they divorced.

An entrepreneur suffered a serious knee injury, preventing him from work or foreign travel. His past earnings record was erratic, and he was involved in numerous very diverse and multi-national projects, ranging from telecoms to sailing to product and property development. His financial affairs were complex, and his accounting records wholly inadequate for estimating his earnings but for the accident.

A young self-employed carpenter was killed in a fatal accident, resulting in a claim for loss of dependency that was put at just under £2million for earnings and pension.

A living mesothelioma claimant was employed in a senior management role with complex high earnings and bonus scheme. The forensic accountant acting for him had estimated loss of earnings and pension benefits at £3million.

Husband was engaged in property investment and development, conducted through dozens of separate business entities, some holding investment properties and others for building projects. The corporate structure was complex, with different ownership structures in various entities. Husband had grouped the companies into four business segments totalling £2.2million.

In a Serious Fraud Office prosecution, several directors of a group of companies engaged in the selling and administration of buy-to-let properties were charged with conspiracy to defraud.

A man operating two commercial whelk fishing boats brought a claim against a local authority, alleging financial losses arising from their actions in removing pots and other fishing equipment from the yard he used.

Two companies – one a furniture manufacturer, the other a mixed farm – were part of a deceased’s estate that was valued for probate purposes. Three years later, the beneficiaries were still in dispute, and the matter was heading to Mediation.

Two accountants entered into partnership, operated an accountancy practice with one office. Over time, they acquired more practices and offices and incorporated the business into a limited company structure. Eventually the partners fell out and agreed to divide equally the business and net assets, including good will. However, they took different approaches to the valuation – one as a multiple fee basis, the other as a multiple of profits.